Response to Sweeney's article
The NCBTMB would like to respond to the recent Viewpoint article in Massage and Bodywork Magazine written by Les Sweeney. In the article, Mr. Sweeney expresses his concern about the decision to allow distance education within a massage therapy educational program. Specifically, he expresses concern that NCBTMB is focusing on how much [distance education] is allowed and not what or how it is learned. However, the role of a certification body is to measure the outcomes of that education – not to dictate how the student learns. Determining how students learn is the responsibility of an accrediting body.
The NCBTMB’s decision to allow distance education does indicate what is and is not acceptable: only course work that is theoretical and not hands-on is allowed. Mr. Sweeney even listed the types of courses that would fit this category (business topics, cautions and contraindications of massage, etc.). The NCBTMB has never specified the exact courses or curricula that a student must have to meet eligibility criteria, only the general categories (e.g. pathology). Mr. Sweeney asks that NCBTMB offer guidance and recommendations to suitable online curricula – to do so would put NCBTMB into the role of an accreditor.
As is the case with all NCBTMB policies and procedures, we welcome your comments and questions and look forward to moving the profession forward. |
